An Unbiased View of a wonderful new world
An Unbiased View of a wonderful new world
Blog Article
1 high-quality working day, from your Mexican Reservation straight into your brave new world, the Savage is brought… In the entire isolation, Amongst the uncivilized natives, he completely scrutinized The whole Functions of William Shakespeare and now, contaminated With all the unhealthy poetic Suggestions, he falls in love… Even so, the outdated fiction seems to get incongruous With all the new reality.
Huxley feared we would turn into a trivial lifestyle, preoccupied with some equal of the feelies, the orgy porgy, plus the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever over the inform to oppose tyranny "failed to take into consideration gentleman's Virtually infinite hunger for interruptions." In 1984, Huxley included, persons are managed by inflicting pain. In Courageous New World, They are really controlled by inflicting enjoyment. In brief, Orwell feared that what we loathe will spoil us. Huxley feared that what we like will ruin us.
نویسنده با شیوه ای سرشار از طنز، و آفرینشهای ادبی، سیر تمدن، و فرهنگ مغرب زمین را، به باد نقد می‌گیرند، و جهات منفی و زیانمند آن را برای جامعه بشری، و کرامت انسانی با واژه های خویش می‌آرایند؛ «هاکسلی» داستان را در ظرف زمانی چند صد سال پس از امروز در خیال خویش می‌پرورد، تا جنبه ی پیش‌گویی، در باب سرشت، و سرنوشت انسان آیند�� را، به خود گیرد؛ چنانکه مبدا تاریخ را نیز از راه طنز «ب.ف = بعد از فورد» برمیگزینند، زیرا، در جامعه ی مورد اشاره ی ایشان، همه چیز بر مدار کژراهه ی علم‌زدگی، و سلطه ی ماشین قرار دارد، و بی‌تردید در چنان جامعه ای، نقش پیشگامان راه سعادت و رستگاری بشر، در رتبه ی کسانی همچون «هنری فورد» آرفینشگر اتوموبیل، فرو کاسته شده، و انسان‌ها نیز با همه ی بزرگواری‌های خویش، به آدمک‌هایی بدل می‌گردند، و در چند گروه «آلفا»، «بتا»، «گاما» و «اپسیلون» بر حسب ویژگی‌های سازمانی و نوع استفاده ای که از هر گروه انتظار می‌رود، هستند؛ در نظامی از این دست، به رغم اینکه همگی آدمک‌ها، در حقارت اشتراک دارند، گروه های گوناگون، بر اساس قوانین سخت‌گیرانه، و تغییرناپذیر، از هم جدا گشته، و با نگرش طبقاتی شدید، به صورت «کاست» و «آپارتاید» اداره می‌شوند؛ تغذیه ی آنان از راه گوش، و به یاری دستگاه‌هایی صوتی است، که از همان ابتدای تولید، و در شیرخوارگاه، بر روی بالش تعبیه شده، تا در زمان خواب، تلقینات بزرگان را، در گوششان فرو خواند، و چنان ملکه ی ذهن آنان شود، که آن آموزه‌ها را، همچون دستگاه پخش صوت، بی‌اراده بازگو کنند؛ در یک چنین جامعه ای، انسان طبیعی، و برخوردار از مکارم بشری، و انگیزه‌های طبیعی، محکوم به فناست؛ منتقدان برآنند، که «هاکسلی» با طنز تلخ، و بدبینانه ی خویش، هم نظام‌های سرمایه داری، و هم حکومت‌های «کمونیستی»، و به طور کلی نظام‌های توتالیتر را، یکجا آماج انتقاد خویش قرار داده اند؛
Asimismo, la parte final ha sido espectacular porque nos da una cátedra sobre la sociedad impresionante. Prácticamente cada una de las frases usadas allí son dignas de destacar porque son muy profundas, sencillas de entender y pueden convertirse en una información muy importante para cada uno de los individuos de una sociedad, es decir, para todos nosotros. Entre esa información, se destaca la necesidad de que exista en una sociedad las clases sociales, ya que sin ellas lo único que ocurriría sería un caos full. Hay Substantiallyísimas frases para destacar, pero solo haré mención de dos porque descubrir esas frases hace parte del premio de quien se anima a leer esta obra:
includes themes or scenes That will not be appropriate for extremely youthful audience Consequently is blocked for his or her security.
His operate with rest-Finding out permits him to know, and disapprove of, his Culture's methods of trying to keep its citizens peaceful, which incorporates their constant intake of the comforting, happiness-producing drug known as "soma". Courting disaster, Bernard is vocal and arrogant about his criticisms, and his manager contemplates exiling him to Iceland thanks to his nonconformity. His only Pal is Helmholtz Watson, a gifted author who finds it challenging to use his skills creatively inside their ache-no cost society.
Most of all Within this looking through could be the characterization of John and of his juxtaposition with him as a product from the savage reservation and of his alienation within the London with the brave new world.
Edit: Viewed Common’s 2020 Television set collection adaptation. It's by and large trustworthy to the novel’s plot and characters, but finally ends up using A lot more liberties given that the episodes go by. It’s also concentrating far more over the leisure opportunity with the reserve (especially the erotica aspects of the orgy-porgies) than around the political debate about the issue of happiness vs liberty.
”We don’t want people captivated by outdated issues. We wish them to similar to the new types.” Rampant consumerism is the only way to maintain the merry-go-spherical turning.
I realize what It is endeavoring to do. I have an understanding of the around-enthusiasm for science as well as depersonalization. I know how displaying a thriving world devoid of interactions and thoughts feels counterintuitive and Mistaken.
He would not enjoy communal sporting activities, solidarity expert services, or promiscuous intercourse. He isn't going to notably appreciate soma. Bernard is in adore with Lenina and isn't going to like her sleeping with other Guys, Although "Anyone belongs to Anyone else". Bernard's triumphant return a wonderful new world to utopian civilisation with John the Savage in the Reservation precipitates the downfall with the Director, who had been intending to exile him. Bernard's triumph is short-lived; He's eventually banished to an island for his non-conformist behaviour.
The Element of the plot I found challenging to swallow was the juxtaposition of the scientifically perfected "utopia" of drug-induced pleasure With all the filthy "pure" world in the savages, who follow absurdly historical rituals. Their world, exactly where "god" remains necessary to balance their suffering and that can help them settle for ageing, hunger and suffering, is like a black-and-white contrast foil.
I'm sure I'll get slammed for indicating this afterwards, especially simply because i by no means do real evaluations or entirely delve into what i'm pondering (so shoot me) but haven't you ever been roaming the world broad inter-Internet and found a little troller you thought "perfectly, this human being is usually a lousy usage of a human Mind?" Indeed, you've got. admit it.
do not forget that previous semester of english course, senior year, exactly where every single course appeared painfully long and excrutiatingly pointless? when Everyone sat all around secretly considering sweet and witty things to put in other people's yearbooks?